THE IMPACT OF TAX REFORMS ON THE VOLUME OF REVENUE GENERATED FROM ALL TAXES AT THE FEDERAL INLAND REVENUE SERVICE (FIRS)

THE IMPACT OF TAX POLICY REFORMS ON

REVENUE GENERATION IN NIGERIA

ABSTRACT

This research study on the impact of tax reforms on revenue generation in Nigeria was carried out to ascertain the impact of tax reforms on the volume of revenue generated from various taxes collectible at the Federal Inland Revenue Service Calabar. Furthermore, the study seeks to discover the impact of the reforms on individual tax and also determine the direction of the impact. Accordingly secondary data of tax revenue for six years and from different tax type were collected. In order to manage the data size, the data were treated as log. The percentage chi-square and Pearson’s Product Moment Correlation coefficient analysis technique were used for the analysis. The result reveals that while the reforms have impact on the volume of revenue generated in some taxes, it however did not have impact on others. It was therefore recommended that: in order to ensure sustainable fiscal policy, the various government tiers should seek the improvement in, the treatment of taxpayers and tax administrator, adequate investment for the tax system and judicious spending of tax payer money.

CHAPTER ONE

INTRODUCTION

1.1      BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY

Nigeria is governed by a federal system; hence its fiscal operations also adhere to the same principle. This has serious implications on how the tax system is managed in the country. In Nigeria, the government’s fiscal power is based on three – tiered tax structure divided between the federal, state and local governments, each of which has different taxes jurisdiction. As of 2002, all three levels of government share about 40 different taxes and levies.

The Nigeria tax system is lopsided, and dominated by oil revenue. The most veritable tax handles are under the control of the federal government while the lower tiers are responsible for the less buoyant ones – the federal government taxes corporate bodies while state and local government tax individuals. While the federal government on average accounts for 90 per cent of the over all revenue annually, it only accounts for about 70 per cent of total government expenditure. In 1995, the breakdown of total tax and levy collection of the three tiers was 96.4 per cent for the federal government and 0.4 per cent for the local government (Phillips, 1997). A major element contributing to this development was the prolonged military rule that had ignored constitutional provision.

Over the past four decades, the country’s revenue was largely derived from primary products. Between 1960 and the early 19970s, revenue from agricultural products dominated, while revenue from other sources was considered as residual. Since the oil boom of 1973/4 to date, however, oil has dominated Nigeria’s revenue structure and its share in federally collected revenue rose from 26.3 percent in 1970 to 81.8, 72.6 and 76.3 in 1979, 1989 and 1999, respectively. Over the past two decades oil was accounted for at least 70 percent of the revenue, thus indicating that traditional tax revenue, has never assumed strong role in the country’s management of fiscal policy. Instead of transforming or diversifying the existing revenue base, fiscal management has merely transited from one primary product-based revenue to another, making the economy susceptible in fluctuation of the international oil market.

The need to address this problem led to several taxes policy reforms. The tax policy reviews of 1991 and 2003, as well as the yearly amendments given in the annual budget, were geared towards addressing this issue. But not much has been achieved. Perhaps to understand the importance of tax policy reforms, one needs to appreciate the urgency for such reforms. Why the need for tax policy reforms in Nigeria? First, there is a compelling need to diversify the revenue portfolio for the country in order to safeguard against the volatility of crude oil prices and to promote fiscal sustainability an economic viability at lower tiers of government. Secondly, Nigeria operates on cash budget system, where as proposals for expenditure are always anchored to revenue projections. This facilitates determining the optimal tax rate for a given level of expenditure. Thus accuracy in revenue projection is vital for devising an appropriate framework for sustainable fiscal management, and this can be realized only if reforms are undertaken on existing tax polices in order to achieve some improvement.

Thirdly, Nigeria tax system is concentrated on petroleum and trade taxes while direct and broad based indirect taxes like the value – added (VAT) are neglected. This is a structural problem for the country’s tax system. Although direct taxes and VAT have the potential for expansion, their impact is limited because of the dominance of the informal sector in the country. Furthermore the limited formal sector is supported with strong unions that act as pressure groups to deter any appreciable tax increment from gross income. Fourthly, the widening fiscal deficit that over the years has threatened macro-economic stability and prospects for economic growth makes the prospect of tax reform very appealing. The ratio of deficit to GDP averaged 9.98 and 6.0 per cent for the periods of 1990- 2001, in 1993 it was 15.5 per cent (Ayodele, 2006).

Also, the study groups on the review of the Nigeria tax system in 1991 and 2003 highlighted the need to increase tax revenue and reduce expenditure as the major fiscal issues to be addressed. As such, the primary objective of the study groups was to optimize revenue from various sources within the country.

Finally, the necessity to improve the tax notification procedure was underscored in order to facilitate effective evaluation of the performance of the Nigeria tax system and to promote adequate planning and implementation. The management associated with regular result – oriented tax reforms has significant bearing on the overall micro economic performance and the distribution of resources between public and private sectors as well as within the public sector.

NOT COMPLETE. PLEASE PAY FOR THE COMPLETE VERSION

THE COMPLETE PROJECT IS CHAPTER 1-5 #4000 ONLY
No of pages: 116

PAYMENT PROCEDURE;

BANK: FIRST BANK

ACCOUNT NAME: EGBE JOHN EDOGI

ACCOUNT NO: 3034851408

GTBANK

ACCOUNT NAME: EGBE JOHN EDOGI

ACCOUNT NO: 0122005571

Please after payment send the teller number and your name the way it appear in the teller to any of the following phone number:

08037940241

08183133884

Email: edogi4u@gmail.com

You will receive your material in your email box within 24 hours after payment

Thanks for doing business with us.